You will be redirected to Dr. Murray's page automatically in 5 seconds. Please bookmark the correct page and look in the FOOTBALL PAGE at http://www.JohnFMurray.com FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


 UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARK WITH
 THIS NEW WEBSITE AT THE URL:
 http://www.JohnFMurray.com

You don't have to be a ROCKET SCIENTIST to understand the MPI, 
but rocket scientists understand the MPI's accuracy!
 


 
"John,  Congrats on MPI beating the spread again!"

 
Cliff Kurtzman - Former Rocket Scientist, Tennis Server Publisher, and Founder of Adastro Corporation


The MPI is a serious performance rating system to help football coaches and teams

The MPI showed that the Eagles looked stronger in a very close game, but that the Patriots were much stronger in pure pressure, and that the Eagles needed to play relatively even with the Patriots in terms of mistakes and turnovers to win. My "pick" was indeed wrong, but it's never about picks, especially in a very close game! That's the fun angle everyone loves. The power is in the MPI data reported before the game on national radio and television. And if you study the data you realize that the MPI was again amazingly accurate!  It
beat the spread for the third straight year and showed its remarkable accuracy in rating performance. It has estimated the course of each of the past 3 Super Bowls, going against the spread and public opinion EACH TIME and it has always won! While the creator of the index might have to flip a coin when the numbers look so close, the fact is that the numbers were accurate once again! This is exciting and I am thrilled to share it with you!  

                                   THREE YEARS OF SUPER BOWL PROOF  

MPI Still Perfect in Estimating Performance of Teams Before Each of the Past 3 Super Bowls. Pre-Game Forecasts in National Media Described Teams as "About Equal" the Past Two Years, and Called Tampa Bay "Much Stronger than Oakland" in 2003.  All Directly Contrary to Convention Wisdom and the Spread. Illustrates the Need to Take Mental Skills in Sports More Seriously. 

                                                 

Jacksonville, FL. February 7. 3 for 3 success is hard to argue with! The MPI worked extremely well again in Super Bowl XXXIX, forecasting an extremely close game. Although Dr. Murray wrongly picked the Eagles to win (the Patriots won by 3), his MPI has beaten conventional wisdom and the spread in each of the three Super Bowl games in which it has been used. "Every broadcaster and writer wants a pick, so and I am happy to join in on the fun if I am not working with one of the two teams, but I always make it clear that the MPI is serious, and that picking the winner has never been the purpose of the MPI," said Dr. Murray. Dr. Murray discussed sport psychology and the MPI on radio and television stations prior to the Super Bowl and how coaches benefit from knowing more precisely how their teams, and their opponents, are performing prior to a game - including for mental factors.   
 
MPI numbers correctly forecasted a "Tampa Bay blowout" win in 2003 against the public consensus that Oakland was a much better team (and huge favorite). MPI data forecasted "extremely close" games before each of the past two Super Bowls even though New England was favored by at least 7 points in each game. The game went down to the final 4 seconds last year, ending in a 3 point Patriots victory. This was the first time in Super Bowl history that the game was tied entering the fourth quarter. It ended in another 3 point New England win.   
 
Conclusion: The MPI is now a perfect 3 for 3 in estimating how the performance of the teams will play out in each of the past three Super Bowls, even if getting the correct pick is a more daunting challenge in an extremely close game where one play can make the difference. "This MPI showed that the teams were about equal the past two years, and that Oakland was much weaker than Tampa Bay in 2003. This just further demonstrates the importance of including mental factors in sports in any consideration of athletic performance. 3 for 3 is hard to argue with! This makes sense because sports are never purely about the physical. Far from it. Many athletes say that mental factors account for anywhere from 50-99% of performance across many sports including football!"
 
John F. Murray, PhD
Sport Performance Psychologist

 UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARK WITH
 THIS NEW WEBSITE AT THE URL:
 http://www.JohnFMurray.com